'Soot-In' protests the use of coal
Student government campaign for renewable energy at OSU takes on a new form Monday
Chelsea Anderson
Issue date: 2/13/07 Section: News
|
Demonstrators were dressed in black and wore masks to symbolize the pollution caused by the utilization of coal and its emissions, said Naomi Tuinstra, a senior in environmental engineering who helped organize the protest.
Childhood asthma, and in extreme cases premature death, are all products of the harmful source, organizers said.
As part of the process of coal formation, methane is released during mining operations. Methane is a greenhouse gas involved in global warming, contributing to acid rain and other acidic aerosols. Coal use has also been linked to dust problems and mercury infected fish, according to worldcoal.org.
Tuinstra is an intern at Northwest Sustainable Energy for Economic Development, an organization stationed in Seattle. She said it is important for environmental groups and individuals who care about the environment to communicate and interact with one another.
The objective of this demonstration was to raise awareness of students.
"We get 70 to 80 percent of our energy from coal. An estimated 22,800 tons of coal is burned for OSU each year," Tuinstra said.
"The biggest problem," said senior Nathan Defrees, "is that coal is not a sustainable source of energy. [We should think about] investing in future generations. [The continued use of coal] will continue to add inverse monitory effects and will continue to cause more health problems, causing detriment to society."
"It would not only be an environmental advance, but an economic one as well," Tuinstra added.
The group will present its petition asking that the university use 100 percent renewable energy in front of the Student/Incidental Fees Committee this Friday from 8 a.m. to 9 a.m. in MU room 213.
It then would move to the Undergraduate and Graduate Senates and would have to be passed by majority vote.
Each student pays about $185 per term in incidental fees. The approval of the proposal will charge an additional $8.50 to full time students, which was recently lowered from $8.88 based on an updated count of the number of full-time students.
Spring Break



Note: writers will not reply to comments.
Viewing Comments 1 - 1 of 1
Kevin Cox
posted 2/13/07 @ 7:02 AM PST
Nice thought but I believe that more could be acomplished by spending the money to increase the amount of renewable energy available and lower cost to everyone. (Continued…)
Post a Comment
Comments by registered users are approved by default.